Match statistics snapshot
- Maccabi Netanya fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Maccabi Netanya was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 22%).
- Beitar Jerusalem held more of the ball (68% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Netanya |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Netanya |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 416Lead | Accurate passes | 167 |
| 519Lead | Total passes | 253 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Netanya |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Netanya |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Netanya |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.