Match statistics snapshot
- Beitar Jerusalem fired more attempts (22 vs 10 shots).
- Maccabi Petah Tikva was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Petah Tikva |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Petah Tikva |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 378Lead | Accurate passes | 371 |
| 441 | Total passes | 457Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Petah Tikva |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Petah Tikva |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Petah Tikva |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.