Match statistics snapshot
- Beitar Jerusalem fired more attempts (16 vs 15 shots).
- Beitar Jerusalem was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Petah Tikva |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Petah Tikva |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 281Lead | Accurate passes | 276 |
| 371Lead | Total passes | 370 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Petah Tikva |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Petah Tikva |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Petah Tikva |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |