Match statistics snapshot
- Beitar Jerusalem fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Maccabi Tel Aviv was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 25%).
- Beitar Jerusalem held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Tel Aviv |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Tel Aviv |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 409Lead | Accurate passes | 199 |
| 519Lead | Total passes | 294 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Tel Aviv |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Tel Aviv |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Beitar Jerusalem | Statistic | Maccabi Tel Aviv |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.