Match statistics snapshot
- Casa Pia created the clearer chances on xG (1.14 vs 1.35, Δ 0.21).
- Benfica fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Benfica was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Benfica | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 1.14 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.35Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Benfica | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 569Lead | Accurate passes | 218 |
| 640Lead | Total passes | 273 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Benfica | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Benfica | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Benfica | Statistic | Casa Pia |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |