Match statistics snapshot
- Birmingham fired more attempts (24 vs 2 shots).
- Birmingham was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 0%).
- Birmingham held more of the ball (76% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 76%Lead | Ball possession | 24% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 58% |
| 611Lead | Accurate passes | 127 |
| 700Lead | Total passes | 220 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Cambridge United |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.