Match statistics snapshot
- Birmingham created the clearer chances on xG (1.37 vs 0.58, Δ 0.79).
- Birmingham fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Birmingham was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Coventry |
|---|---|---|
| 1.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.58 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Coventry |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 196 | Accurate passes | 572Lead |
| 262 | Total passes | 647Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Coventry |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Coventry |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Coventry |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.