Match statistics snapshot
- Huddersfield created the clearer chances on xG (1.78 vs 2.31, Δ 0.53).
- Huddersfield fired more attempts (17 vs 12 shots).
- Birmingham was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 1.78 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.31Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 351Lead | Accurate passes | 215 |
| 442Lead | Total passes | 305 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.