Match statistics snapshot
- Hull City created the clearer chances on xG (0.61 vs 1.32, Δ 0.71).
- Hull City fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
- Hull City was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 0.61 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.32Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 320 | Accurate passes | 464Lead |
| 408 | Total passes | 530Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 6 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.