Match statistics snapshot
- Ipswich created the clearer chances on xG (1.27 vs 1.48, Δ 0.21).
- Ipswich fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Ipswich was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 1.27 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.48Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 169 | Accurate passes | 438Lead |
| 256 | Total passes | 549Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |