Match statistics snapshot
- Birmingham created the clearer chances on xG (2.13 vs 1.22, Δ 0.91).
- Leeds fired more attempts (19 vs 18 shots).
- Birmingham was more accurate in front of goal (28% on target vs 16%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 2.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.22 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 18 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 430Lead | Accurate passes | 332 |
| 527Lead | Total passes | 443 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 10 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 12Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |