Match statistics snapshot
- Port Vale fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Port Vale was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 0%).
- Birmingham held more of the ball (70% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 467Lead | Accurate passes | 157 |
| 560Lead | Total passes | 235 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |