Match statistics snapshot
- Birmingham created the clearer chances on xG (1.42 vs 0.23, Δ 1.19).
- Birmingham fired more attempts (11 vs 4 shots).
- Birmingham was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Preston |
|---|---|---|
| 1.42Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.23 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Preston |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 71%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 287Lead | Accurate passes | 214 |
| 402Lead | Total passes | 334 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Preston |
|---|---|---|
| Corner kicks |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Preston |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Preston |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |