Match statistics snapshot
- Birmingham fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 14%).
- Reading held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 226 | Accurate passes | 395Lead |
| 311 | Total passes | 480Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| Yellow cards |