Match statistics snapshot
- Rotherham created the clearer chances on xG (0.73 vs 1.16, Δ 0.43).
- Birmingham held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.73 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.16Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5 | Shots off target |
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 359Lead | Accurate passes | 171 |
| 453Lead | Total passes | 270 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |