Match statistics snapshot
- Sheffield Wednesday created the clearer chances on xG (1.32 vs 2.13, Δ 0.81).
- Sheffield Wednesday fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 1.32 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.13Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 305Lead | Accurate passes | 261 |
| 395Lead | Total passes | 360 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.