Match statistics snapshot
- Birmingham created the clearer chances on xG (1.60 vs 1.26, Δ 0.34).
- Birmingham fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Stoke City was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 1.60Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.26 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 297Lead | Accurate passes | 295 |
| 390 | Total passes | 399Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.