Match statistics snapshot
- Birmingham created the clearer chances on xG (1.41 vs 1.27, Δ 0.14).
- Birmingham fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Sunderland was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 1.41Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.27 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 291 | Accurate passes | 314Lead |
| 370 | Total passes | 389Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Birmingham | Statistic | Sunderland |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |