Match statistics snapshot
- BK Hacken created the clearer chances on xG (2.55 vs 1.24, Δ 1.31).
- BK Hacken fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
- Degerfors IF was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 37%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 2.55Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.24 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 618Lead | Accurate passes | 247 |
| 699Lead | Total passes | 338 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | Degerfors If |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |