Match statistics snapshot
- IF Brommapojkarna created the clearer chances on xG (2.84 vs 3.10, Δ 0.26).
- IF Brommapojkarna fired more attempts (26 vs 17 shots).
- BK Hacken was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Brommapojkarna |
|---|---|---|
| 2.84 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.10Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 13 |
| 4 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Shots on target | 8 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 13Lead |
|---|
| 17 | Total shots | 26Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Brommapojkarna |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 458 | Accurate passes | 460Lead |
| 528 | Total passes | 531Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Brommapojkarna |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Brommapojkarna |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Brommapojkarna |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |