Match statistics snapshot
- IF elfsborg created the clearer chances on xG (1.62 vs 2.17, Δ 0.55).
- IF elfsborg fired more attempts (28 vs 9 shots).
- BK Hacken was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.62 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.17Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 15Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 28Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 290 | Accurate passes | 422Lead |
| 363 | Total passes | 485Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 16Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 17Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |