Match statistics snapshot
- IF elfsborg created the clearer chances on xG (2.36 vs 2.38, Δ 0.02).
- IF elfsborg fired more attempts (23 vs 15 shots).
- BK Hacken was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2.36 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.38Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12 | Shots inside the box | 17Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 7 | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 475Lead | Accurate passes | 246 |
| 543Lead | Total passes | 301 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |