Match statistics snapshot
- BK Hacken created the clearer chances on xG (2.41 vs 1.65, Δ 0.76).
- BK Hacken fired more attempts (21 vs 13 shots).
- IF elfsborg was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2.41Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.65 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 449Lead | Accurate passes | 239 |
| 506Lead | Total passes | 310 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bk Hacken | Statistic | If Elfsborg |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |