Match statistics snapshot
- Reading created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 3.98, Δ 2.87).
- Reading fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Blackpool held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Blackpool | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.98Lead |
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Blackpool | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 385Lead | Accurate passes | 171 |
| 490Lead | Total passes | 282 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Blackpool | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Blackpool | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Blackpool | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |