Match statistics snapshot
- Blooming created the clearer chances on xG (1.33 vs 0.60, Δ 0.73).
- Blooming fired more attempts (19 vs 8 shots).
- Carabobo FC was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Blooming | Statistic | Carabobo Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.33Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.60 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Blooming | Statistic | Carabobo Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 489Lead | Accurate passes | 313 |
| 572Lead | Total passes | 405 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Blooming | Statistic | Carabobo Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Blooming | Statistic | Carabobo Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| 1.53 | Goals prevented | 1.53 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Blooming | Statistic | Carabobo Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |