Match statistics snapshot
- Blooming created the clearer chances on xG (1.20 vs 0.38, Δ 0.82).
- Blooming fired more attempts (10 vs 5 shots).
- River Plate was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Blooming | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 1.20Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.38 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Blooming | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 317Lead | Accurate passes | 155 |
| 413Lead | Total passes | 238 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Blooming | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Blooming | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| 0.15 | Goals prevented | 0.15 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Blooming | Statistic | River Plate |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 6 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |