Match statistics snapshot
- Famalicao created the clearer chances on xG (0.96 vs 1.32, Δ 0.36).
- Boavista fired more attempts (11 vs 10 shots).
- Boavista was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Boavista | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 0.96 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.32Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Boavista | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 80%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 334Lead | Accurate passes | 237 |
| 416Lead | Total passes | 306 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Boavista | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Boavista | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Boavista | Statistic | Famalicao |
|---|---|---|
| 23 | Fouls | 20Lead |
| 1Lead | Red cards | 2 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |