Match statistics snapshot
- Boca Juniors created the clearer chances on xG (1.33 vs 0.29, Δ 1.04).
- Banfield fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Boca Juniors was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Boca Juniors | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 1.33Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.29 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Boca Juniors | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 383Lead | Accurate passes | 267 |
| 452Lead | Total passes | 335 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Boca Juniors | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Boca Juniors | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -1.78 | Goals prevented | -1.78 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Boca Juniors | Statistic | Banfield |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.