Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (0.96 vs 0.54, Δ 0.42).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 20%).
- Bodo/Glimt held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 0.96Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.54 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 503Lead | Accurate passes | 395 |
| 567Lead | Total passes | 466 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Club Brugge Kv |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.