Match statistics snapshot
- FC Porto created the clearer chances on xG (2.09 vs 2.56, Δ 0.47).
- FC Porto fired more attempts (28 vs 11 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 2.09 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.56Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 18Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 12Lead |
| 7 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 28Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 292 | Accurate passes | 519Lead |
| 354 | Total passes | 582Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 0.66 | Goals prevented | 0.66 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fc Porto |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 8 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |