Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (1.60 vs 0.71, Δ 0.89).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (16 vs 5 shots).
- Fredrikstad was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 1.60Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.71 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 588Lead | Accurate passes | 243 |
| 667Lead | Total passes | 327 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |