Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (2.45 vs 0.42, Δ 2.03).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (22 vs 3 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 2.45Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.42 |
| Offsides | ||
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 495Lead | Accurate passes | 294 |
| 568Lead | Total passes | 383 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |