Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (2.24 vs 0.12, Δ 2.12).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (20 vs 2 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 2.24Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.12 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 3Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 683Lead | Accurate passes | 326 |
| 766Lead | Total passes | 397 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 1.34 | Goals prevented | 1.34 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |