Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (1.66 vs 0.48, Δ 1.18).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 1.66Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.48 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 600Lead | Accurate passes | 203 |
| 649Lead | Total passes | 268 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.