Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (2.88 vs 0.58, Δ 2.30).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (22 vs 8 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 2.88Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.58 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 20Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 77%Lead | Ball possession | 23% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 682Lead | Accurate passes | 151 |
| 744Lead | Total passes | 221 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |