Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Haugesund was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
- Bodo/Glimt held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| 6 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 484Lead | Accurate passes | 295 |
| 546Lead | Total passes | 366 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.