Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (70% on target vs 50%).
- Bodo/Glimt held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 2 | Shots off target | 2 |
| 7 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 517Lead | Accurate passes | 299 |
| 582Lead | Total passes | 365 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.