Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Haugesund was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 6%).
- Bodo/Glimt held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 512Lead | Accurate passes | 307 |
| 585Lead | Total passes | 380 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 6 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.