Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (2.45 vs 0.77, Δ 1.68).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (24 vs 9 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 2.45Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.77 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 504Lead | Accurate passes | 326 |
| 584Lead | Total passes | 406 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |