Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (4.16 vs 0.14, Δ 4.02).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (36 vs 3 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt held more of the ball (69% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 4.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.14 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 31Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 36Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 714Lead | Accurate passes | 287 |
| 784Lead | Total passes | 364 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 19Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |