Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (1.19 vs 1.56, Δ 0.37).
- Inter fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 1.19 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.56Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 365 | Accurate passes | 527Lead |
| 452 | Total passes | 607Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.15 | Goals prevented | -0.15 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |