Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (2.56 vs 0.88, Δ 1.68).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.56Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.88 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 502Lead | Accurate passes | 449 |
| 596Lead | Total passes | 550 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.