Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (2.08 vs 0.51, Δ 1.57).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (11 vs 5 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt held more of the ball (72% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 2.08Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.51 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 72%Lead | Ball possession | 28% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 642Lead | Accurate passes | 213 |
| 707Lead | Total passes | 277 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Kfum Oslo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |