Bodo/Glimt vs Kristiansund BK
Key events
View all
Kristiansund BK- O. Brynhildsen
- L. Alvheim
- F. Flex
- A. Helmersen
Bodo/GlimtFT 3–1
Predictions & odds
View allModel outlook versus market-implied chances (overround removed from decimal odds). For entertainment and analysis only — not betting advice.
Model blend
Estimated outcome mix from Sportra's pre-match model
- Bodo/Glimt50%
- Draw50%
- Kristiansund BK0%
Prematch market
Source: William Hill
- Bodo/Glimt89.4%
- Draw7.3%
- Kristiansund BK3.3%
Live market
No in-play odds snapshot was captured for this match.
Venue
Aspmyra Stadion
Hakata · Norway
- Address
- Håloglandsgata 30
- Surface
- artificial turf
- Capacity
- 8270
Match
Sigurd Smehus Kringstad, Norway
Round 23
- Referee
- Sigurd Smehus Kringstad, Norway
- Round
- Round 23
- Date
Competition
League · Norway
- Country
- Norway (NO)
- Season
- 2026
- Dates
- 2026-03-14 → 2026-12-13
Match statistics
View allKey metrics
Visual snapshot of possession, chance quality, and shooting.
Possession
79%79%21%21%
Expected goals (xG)
4.0594%0.276%
Total shots
2586%414%
Shots on target
873%327%
Team form & competition
View all- #1Position
- 56Points
- 18-2-3W-D-L
- 58/20Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 5-0 / 1-4
- Worst defeats
- 0-1 / 5-0
- #15Position
- 19Points
- 5-4-14W-D-L
- 23/47Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 2-0 / 1-2
- Worst defeats
- 1-4 / 8-1
Head to head
View all13Bodo/Glimtwins
2Drawsmatches
0Kristiansund BKwins
Recorded meetings: 15 (available previous meetings, not necessarily all-time).
- Highest scoring
- Bodo/Glimt 7–1 Kristiansund BK
- Bodo/Glimt most goals
- Bodo/Glimt 7–1 Kristiansund BK
- Kristiansund BK most goals
- Kristiansund BK 2–4 Bodo/Glimt
Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (4.05 vs 0.27, Δ 3.78). Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (25 vs 4 shots). Kristiansund BK was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 32%). Bodo/Glimt held more of the ball (79% possession).
Bodo/Glimt underperformed their xG by 1.0 goals (3 scored vs 4.05 xG). Kristiansund BK outperformed their xG by 0.7 goals (1 scored vs 0.27 xG).