Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (2.26 vs 0.40, Δ 1.86).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (12 vs 6 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 2.26Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.40 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 545Lead | Accurate passes | 374 |
| 613Lead | Total passes | 449 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -1.06 | Goals prevented | -1.06 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |