Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (1.60 vs 1.23, Δ 0.37).
- Manchester City fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 1.60Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.23 |
| 6 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 306 | Accurate passes | 640Lead |
| 368 | Total passes | 696Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.49 | Goals prevented | -0.49 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |