Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (21 vs 3 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 43%).
- Bodo/Glimt held more of the ball (79% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 79%Lead | Ball possession | 21% |
| 91%Lead | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 694Lead | Accurate passes | 116 |
| 765Lead | Total passes | 189 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.