Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (1.89 vs 1.02, Δ 0.87).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (18 vs 9 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.89Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.02 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 397 | Accurate passes | 404Lead |
| 455 | Total passes | 471Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.