Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (2.78 vs 1.03, Δ 1.75).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (22 vs 17 shots).
- Sandefjord was more accurate in front of goal (41% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 2.78Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.03 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 529Lead | Accurate passes | 356 |
| 605Lead | Total passes | 428 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.