Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (3.90 vs 0.05, Δ 3.85).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (24 vs 4 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 3.90Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.05 |
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 573Lead | Accurate passes | 343 |
| 653Lead | Total passes | 411 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Bodo/glimt | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.